# MediaCMS vs Vintrack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | Vintrack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #3 of 6 in Feed Aggregator |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 ✓ | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.7.10 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 49/100 for Vintrack, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Vintrack.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaCMS is easier to run; Vintrack needs more configuration.

MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [Vintrack](https://selfhost.directory/project/vintrack-vinted-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vintrack-vinted-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-vintrack-vinted-monitor