# MediaCMS vs unraid-config-guardian

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | unraid-config-guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #38 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 5 171 ✓ | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.6.1 · 16 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 46/100 for unraid-config-guardian, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unraid-config-guardian.

MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [unraid-config-guardian](https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-unraid-config-guardian