# MediaCMS vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for uMap.

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-umap