# MediaCMS vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 | 117 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +5 391 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-tradingagents