# MediaCMS vs ShellHub

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | ShellHub |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #12 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 ✓ | 2 243 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +175 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.28.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 64/100 for ShellHub, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ShellHub.

ShellHub is growing faster right now (+175 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [ShellHub](https://selfhost.directory/project/shellhub) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shellhub.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-shellhub