# MediaCMS vs PyRunner

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | PyRunner |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #22 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 5 171 ✓ | 168 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.0.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 45/100 for PyRunner, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for PyRunner.

MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [PyRunner](https://selfhost.directory/project/pyrunner) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pyrunner.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-pyrunner