# MediaCMS vs Project OSRM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | Project OSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 | 8 178 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +75 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 16 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Project OSRM scores 69/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Project OSRM.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaCMS is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-project-osrm