# MediaCMS vs pr-agent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | pr-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 5 172 | 13 690 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +547 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 23 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.49.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

pr-agent scores 77/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for pr-agent.

pr-agent is growing faster right now (+547 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [pr-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-pr-agent