# MediaCMS vs PowerSync Service

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | PowerSync Service |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #35 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 171 ✓ | 397 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.27.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 49/100 for PowerSync Service, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PowerSync Service.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaCMS is easier to run; PowerSync Service needs more configuration.

MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [PowerSync Service](https://selfhost.directory/project/powersync-service) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/powersync-service.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-powersync-service