# MediaCMS vs Apache Pinot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | Apache Pinot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #7 of 7 in Databases & storage |
| GitHub stars | 5 171 | 6 169 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | release-1.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | — |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 33/100 for Apache Pinot, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache Pinot.

MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [Apache Pinot](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-pinot