# MediaCMS vs Piik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | Piik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 169 ✓ | 3 851 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +393 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Piik scores 73/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Piik.

If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; MediaCMS needs more configuration.

Piik is growing faster right now (+393 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [Piik](https://selfhost.directory/project/piik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piik.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-piik