# MediaCMS vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MediaCMS | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 5 171 | 61 824 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +1 482 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.

MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaCMS is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 482 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MediaCMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediacms.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mediacms-vs-penpot