# WeChat Markdown Editor vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WeChat Markdown Editor | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 481 ✓ | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | WTFPL | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

zookeeper scores 73/100 against 71/100 for WeChat Markdown Editor, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WeChat Markdown Editor](https://selfhost.directory/project/md) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/md.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/md-vs-zookeeper