# WeChat Markdown Editor vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WeChat Markdown Editor | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 13 476 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +103 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | WTFPL | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

WeChat Markdown Editor scores 72/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WeChat Markdown Editor](https://selfhost.directory/project/md) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/md.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/md-vs-zammad