# WeChat Markdown Editor vs xBrowserSync

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WeChat Markdown Editor | xBrowserSync |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #17 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 13 478 ✓ | 855 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +30 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | WTFPL | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

WeChat Markdown Editor scores 71/100 against 54/100 for xBrowserSync, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; xBrowserSync needs more configuration.

WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WeChat Markdown Editor](https://selfhost.directory/project/md) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/md.md)
- [xBrowserSync](https://selfhost.directory/project/xbrowsersync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xbrowsersync.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/md-vs-xbrowsersync