# WeChat Markdown Editor vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WeChat Markdown Editor | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 13 476 ✓ | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | WTFPL | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

WeChat Markdown Editor scores 72/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for WeChat Markdown Editor.

If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WeChat Markdown Editor](https://selfhost.directory/project/md) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/md.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/md-vs-voidaccess