# WeChat Markdown Editor vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WeChat Markdown Editor | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 13 481 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | WTFPL | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

WeChat Markdown Editor scores 71/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.

WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WeChat Markdown Editor](https://selfhost.directory/project/md) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/md.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/md-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api