# WeChat Markdown Editor vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WeChat Markdown Editor | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 13 481 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | WTFPL | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

WeChat Markdown Editor scores 71/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for WeChat Markdown Editor.

WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WeChat Markdown Editor](https://selfhost.directory/project/md) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/md.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/md-vs-unbagrnd