# WeChat Markdown Editor vs UmlautAdaptarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WeChat Markdown Editor | UmlautAdaptarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 482 ✓ | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | WTFPL | — |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

WeChat Markdown Editor scores 71/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.

UmlautAdaptarr ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for WeChat Markdown Editor.

If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; UmlautAdaptarr needs more configuration.

WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WeChat Markdown Editor](https://selfhost.directory/project/md) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/md.md)
- [UmlautAdaptarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/umlautadaptarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umlautadaptarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/md-vs-umlautadaptarr