# MCSManager vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MCSManager | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 62 in Game Servers | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 004 | 89 759 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +2 420 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.

MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 420 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MCSManager](https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mcsmanager-vs-world-monitor