# MCSManager vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MCSManager | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 62 in Game Servers | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 5 005 | 60 020 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +2 632 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.

MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Twenty.

If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; Twenty needs more configuration.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 632 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MCSManager](https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mcsmanager-vs-twenty