# MCSManager vs Shinobi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MCSManager | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 62 in Game Servers | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 5 005 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

MCSManager scores 68/100 against 66/100 for Shinobi, so it is the safer default.

MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.

If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

MCSManager is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MCSManager](https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager.md)
- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mcsmanager-vs-shinobi