MCSManagervsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MCSManager | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 62 in Game Servers | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 5 005 | 15 375 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +43 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 13 |
| Latest release | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.
If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
MCSManager details →PeerTube details →