MCSManagervsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MCSManager | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 62 in Game Servers | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 5 004 | 28 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +454 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 10 |
| Latest release | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenWrt.
If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+454 stars in 30 days).
MCSManager details →OpenWrt details →