MCSManagervsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MCSManager | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 62 in Game Servers | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 5 005 | 393 291 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +2 943 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 37 |
| Latest release | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for MCSManager.
If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 943 stars in 30 days).
MCSManager details →openclaw details →