mcp-grafanavsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mcp-grafana | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 3 625 | 93 082 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +57 808 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 35 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 65/100 for mcp-grafana, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for mcp-grafana.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 808 stars in 30 days).
mcp-grafana details →OmniVoice-Studio details →