# mbusd vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mbusd | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 684 | 12 827 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.5.3 · 7 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

zookeeper scores 73/100 against 52/100 for mbusd, so it is the safer default.

mbusd ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

zookeeper is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mbusd](https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mbusd-vs-zookeeper