mbusdvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mbusd | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 685 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.5.3 · 7 Apr 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 52/100 for mbusd, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for mbusd.
If you want the quickest setup, mbusd is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
mbusd details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep mbusd, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with