# mbusd vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mbusd | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 685 | 24 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +775 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.3 · 7 Apr 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 52/100 for mbusd, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for mbusd.

If you want the quickest setup, mbusd is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+775 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mbusd](https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mbusd-vs-temporal