# mbusd vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mbusd | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 685 | 45 054 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 653 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.3 · 7 Apr 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 52/100 for mbusd, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for mbusd.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 653 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mbusd](https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mbusd-vs-reactive-resume