# mbusd vs Radarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mbusd | Radarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 685 | 14 672 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +241 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.3 · 7 Apr 2026 | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 52/100 for mbusd, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for mbusd.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; mbusd needs more configuration.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+241 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mbusd](https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd.md)
- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mbusd-vs-radarr