# mbusd vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mbusd | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 685 | 91 926 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +485 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.3 · 7 Apr 2026 | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 52/100 for mbusd, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for mbusd.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mbusd](https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mbusd-vs-paddleocr