# mbusd vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mbusd | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 685 | 393 335 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +2 911 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.3 · 7 Apr 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 52/100 for mbusd, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for mbusd.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 911 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mbusd](https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mbusd-vs-openclaw