# mbusd vs OmniTools

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mbusd | OmniTools |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 685 | 10 515 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +268 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.5.3 · 7 Apr 2026 | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniTools scores 72/100 against 52/100 for mbusd, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; mbusd needs more configuration.

OmniTools is growing faster right now (+268 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mbusd](https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd.md)
- [OmniTools](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mbusd-vs-omnitools