# mbusd vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mbusd | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 684 | 9 167 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.3 · 7 Apr 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 52/100 for mbusd, so it is the safer default.

Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for mbusd.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mbusd](https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mbusd.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mbusd-vs-octoprint