# Maza ad blocking vs ublproxy

> Two self-hosted [Pi-Hole alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/pi-hole), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Maza ad blocking | ublproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 31/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 41 in DNS | #11 of 12 in Privacy |
| GitHub stars | 1 875 ✓ | 21 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 0.1.0-7d48797 · 6 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Maza ad blocking scores 56/100 against 31/100 for ublproxy, so it is the safer default.

ublproxy ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Maza ad blocking.

If you want the quickest setup, Maza ad blocking is easier to run; ublproxy needs more configuration.

Maza ad blocking is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Maza ad blocking](https://selfhost.directory/project/maza-ad-blocking) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/maza-ad-blocking.md)
- [ublproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/ublproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ublproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/maza-ad-blocking-vs-ublproxy