# Maza ad blocking vs Numa

> Two self-hosted [Pi-Hole alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/pi-hole), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Maza ad blocking | Numa |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 57/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #17 of 41 in DNS | #16 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 875 | 1 953 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.25.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Numa scores 57/100 against 56/100 for Maza ad blocking, so it is the safer default.

Numa ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Maza ad blocking.

If you want the quickest setup, Maza ad blocking is easier to run; Numa needs more configuration.

Maza ad blocking is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Maza ad blocking](https://selfhost.directory/project/maza-ad-blocking) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/maza-ad-blocking.md)
- [Numa](https://selfhost.directory/project/numa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/numa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/maza-ad-blocking-vs-numa