# Open Home Foundation Matter Server vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Home Foundation Matter Server | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #42 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 402 | 2 922 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +120 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.5.5 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 56/100 for Open Home Foundation Matter Server, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Open Home Foundation Matter Server.

If you want the quickest setup, Zot Registry is easier to run; Open Home Foundation Matter Server needs more configuration.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Home Foundation Matter Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/matterjs-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matterjs-server.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matterjs-server-vs-zot-registry