# Matrix-Telegram bridge vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Matrix-Telegram bridge | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Bridges | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 1 752 | 15 762 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +102 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2610.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 65/100 for Matrix-Telegram bridge, so it is the safer default.

Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Matrix-Telegram bridge.

If you want the quickest setup, Zigbee2MQTT is easier to run; Matrix-Telegram bridge needs more configuration.

Zigbee2MQTT is growing faster right now (+102 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Matrix-Telegram bridge](https://selfhost.directory/project/matrix-telegram-bridge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matrix-telegram-bridge.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matrix-telegram-bridge-vs-zigbee2mqtt