# matrix-media-repo vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | matrix-media-repo | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #53 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 239 | 91 868 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +427 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 52/100 for matrix-media-repo, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for matrix-media-repo.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; matrix-media-repo needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+427 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [matrix-media-repo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matrix-media-repo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matrix-media-repo.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matrix-media-repo-vs-paddleocr