# Matomo vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Matomo | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 21 984 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +90 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Matomo scores 74/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Matomo is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Matomo is growing faster right now (+90 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Matomo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matomo-vs-windows-arm