# Matomo vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Matomo | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 21 985 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +91 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

Matomo scores 74/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, Matomo is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Matomo is growing faster right now (+91 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Matomo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matomo-vs-urbit