# Matomo vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Matomo | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 21 985 | 93 048 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +91 | +1 254 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 74/100 for Matomo, so it is the safer default.

Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Matomo needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Matomo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matomo-vs-uptime-kuma