# Matomo vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Matomo | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 21 985 ✓ | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +91 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Matomo scores 74/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Matomo needs more configuration.

Matomo is growing faster right now (+91 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Matomo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matomo-vs-upptime