# Matomo vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Matomo | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 21 984 | 47 726 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +90 ✓ | +19 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 74/100 for Matomo, so it is the safer default.

Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Matomo needs more configuration.

Matomo is growing faster right now (+90 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Matomo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matomo-vs-text-generation-webui