# Matomo vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Matomo | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 21 984 | 95 319 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +90 | +2 357 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 25 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 74/100 for Matomo, so it is the safer default.

Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 357 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Matomo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matomo-vs-stirling-pdf