# Matomo vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Matomo | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 21 985 | 35 795 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +91 | +834 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 28 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 74/100 for Matomo, so it is the safer default.

Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Matomo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matomo-vs-seaweedfs