# Matomo vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Matomo | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 21 984 | 35 307 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +90 | +504 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 74/100 for Matomo, so it is the safer default.

Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+504 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Matomo](https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/matomo.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/matomo-vs-qdrant