# Mastodon vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mastodon | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 50 456 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Ruby | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Mastodon scores 82/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.

Mastodon is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mastodon](https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mastodon-vs-uusec-waf