# Mastodon vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mastodon | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 50 457 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Mastodon scores 82/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.

Mastodon is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mastodon](https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mastodon-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api